版主,你的思維就像墻頭草……一會看”茄力家”的”妙作”時,覺得自己怪錯mcpig 一會看到這篇文章又同意?豪小子真是多虧有你們這樣”好了傷疤忘了疼”的”自稱豪粉”!!比”黑豪””酸豪”更討厭!!

看到版主的回應安心多了~
相信每個喜歡林書豪的人都只是太關注他~擔心他因為教練的關係而壓縮了表現空間~
不過，我ㄧ直都相信林書豪是個聰明的孩子
所以我們才能看到他一次次克服困境與外界的批評聲浪~如果他是個遇到困境就投降~遇到不好的教練就擺爛罷工故意打輸球的球員~那麼或許他就不是眾多豪迷喜歡的林書豪了~
樓上那位沒有具名的訪客先生(小姐)~
我也相信他一定也是某種程度上非常關心林書豪的鐵桿粉絲~
但我自己認為我相信版主應該也這麼想
我們都察覺得出來已經有很多場教練雪藏林書豪的情況~只是對上魔術那場，的確林書豪的腳踝扭傷是滿嚴重的~賽前練習影片放上來，也是希望許多關心林書豪的球迷可以知道他的健康狀況~也稍稍理解教練最後的安排~但這並不代表我們偏袒教練或認為教練每場調度都很合理妥當~
我也相信林書豪並不樂見最終因為自己粉絲強烈抗議下，而讓麥克海爾走人~這樣外界總會在他身上貼上”教練殺手”這標籤~就如同安東尼跟丹東尼之間的矛盾般~不管當時真相究竟如何，安東尼至今始終要背負這個”罵名”~

出於愛護林書豪的心情~我不願看到他也被冠上這樣的名號~他的nba生涯會遇到好的隊友也可能遇到不好的隊友~他會遇上知遇他的教練也可能會碰上沒有發覺他價值的教練~但這都將會是他籃球生涯裡寶貴的經驗~
就如同我們在求職生涯中，你總也會遇上一開始不看好你的同事或上司，難道這時候我們就只選擇豪氣地離職走人~然後再尋覓自己理想的公司嗎?
職業生涯裡是沒有這麼多夢幻公司可以選擇的，而身為小市民的我們也僅能拿出自己的能力來說服上司同事，用表現說話這才能真正叫人信服~

相對來說林書豪的籃球生涯也是他的職場生涯~我們當然會心疼他遇到不合理的調度與對待~但是我們是不是應該也要相信他有能力與智慧能夠在困境裡找出自己的路~就如林書豪自己所言，不管輸球贏球他都把自己交給上帝~我相信同理不管他遇上好上司或是不通情理的上司他都能在上帝指引下找到他該走的方向~~

分享這篇在火箭官網的球迷留言–我不確定他提供數據的正確性–這點有賴版主的專業判斷！
〈這是寫給老麥的—不過作者認為老麥應該不會看〉
–原文很長，以下只做摘要翻譯。如有不正確，尚請 指正–
1.從數據分析哈登、小錢和書豪在場上失誤率和球隊勝率的關係。有趣的是：哈登和小錢失誤越多輸球越多，失誤越少勝利越多；相反的書豪失誤越多，球隊反而勝利越多。–這些數據已經很清楚說明球權應該交給誰了。
2.一個好的控球者〈如：書豪〉，即使發生高失誤也能幫助球隊贏球。傳球本來就有失誤的風險，那不全是傳球者的錯，尤其是當你的隊友經常漏接時… (好像是在說Asik吧？lol )〉
3.麥克海爾老愛把關鍵球的處理交給哈登或帕森斯。但不幸的是，本賽季就這點而言，這個選擇已被證明對火箭隊取勝的用處不大。
4.請別老在輸球後說你的球員需要做更好的防守。我們都知道火箭隊的防守很爛，但團隊防守本來就要長時間才能改善。其實，通常情況下，“真正”失敗的原因無關防守，而是有關執行。教練團的計劃經常猶豫不決，重複又僵化，所以球員也經常無法履行它……。
From：Hao F Chen
To Mr. McHale (j/k, he’s never going to read this),
– The Connection Between Turnovers and Victories –
/*Format:
#.
Last name of the player:
Turnovers / Win-Loss / Winning percentage
Note: For turnovers, “#+” equal to “# or more” and “#-” equal to “# or less”
*/

1.
Harden
6+ / 2-7 / 22%
4+ / 13-20 / 39%
3- / 18-7 / 72%
2- / 11-3 / 79%
1- / 8-0 / 100%

2.Parsons
4+ / 2-6 / 25%
2- / 23-16 / 59%

3.Lin
1- / 3-6 / 33%
3- / 18-22 / 45%
4+ / 13-6 / 68%
5+ / 6-2 / 75%
6+ / 4-0 / 100%

In my humbly personal opinion, it is quite clear who should be the main ball-handler.

Please don’t get me wrong. Turnovers are never good (By the way, Lin hasn’t ever turned over 9 or more times this season. I truly have no idea where your “home-run theory of 29-points-and-9-turnovers” came from). However, sharing the ball always has the risk of turning it over. It is not always the passer’s fault – especially when you have a teammate who often lets ball slip away.

A good passer could have high TOs due to his willingness to pass the ball. On the other hand, a bad passer – or a ballhog – could have high TOs due to unwise choices of attacking the rim or passing unwisely near the end of 24 seconds.

Attack-the-rim-wise, Lin remains less consistent -though improving- than Harden and Parsons, Rockets’s the other two main ball handlers, so it is understandable why you (Mr. McHale) frequently chose to iso play Harden or play Parsons as ball handler at critical times. Unfortunately, up to this point of current season, your choices had proven little usefulness to Rockets’s victories.

Last but not least, please be more flexible at player rotation. Now nearly everyone could tell when you would rest and play whom. Shouldn’t player rotation correspond to situations on the court in real time, as well? Please prove me wrong if you could, but it seems that your stiff “rotation policy” frequently causes you to be uncertain of what and whom to play at critical times, including today’s loss against Bucks.

Just my two cents. Though the chance is extremely low, hope my two cents wouldn’t just drop into abyss.

Sincerely,
Hao F. C.

—— Ah, I forgot to add:
Please stop saying players need to do better defense during interviews after losses. We all know Rockets’s defense sucks, but defense as a team takes time to improve – a lot of time, in fact. Often the “true” reason of loss wasn’t about defense. It’s about execution. The plans were frequently indecisive and repetitive, so players frequently failed to carry it out, due to correct counter-moves from opponents’ defenses.